Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has risen no one greater than John the Baptist; yet he who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.[1]It is possible to understand the coming of Christ as foreseen from the first moment of creation; and, in the same way, the part that the Virgin Mary was going to play in the mystery of the Incarnation can also be understood as foreseen from the first moment of creation. This is summarised in the images of Christ as the “new Adam” and the Virgin Mary as the “new Eve”; Adam and Eve in the book of Genesis, Christ and the Virgin Mary in the New Testament. The story of the physical creation, the history of mankind and the history of God’s dealings with his people in the Old Testament can all then be understood as a “salvation history” focussed on and directed towards the coming of Christ. Within this vision, the part played by John the Baptist is also foreseen from the beginning of creation.
.. for he will be great before the Lord, and he shall drink no wine nor strong drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit, even from his mother's womb.[2]
John was ‘filled with the Holy Spirit even from his mother’s womb’ by Christ himself, whom the Virgin Mary had just conceived by the Holy Spirit. Mary’s visitation to Elizabeth thus became a visit from God to his people… In John, the precursor, the Holy Spirit completes the work of ‘[making] ready a people prepared for the Lord’…. with John the Baptist, the Holy Spirit begins the restoration to man of ‘the divine likeness’, prefiguring what he would achieve with and in Christ. John’s baptism was for repentance; baptism in water and the Spirit will be a new birth.[3]
Pope Benedict XVI suggests that we should see in the event of the Baptism of Jesus by John an anticipation of the death and resurrection of Jesus. Jesus going down into the water of the Jordan river is an anticipation of his death and descent into hell to liberate those held captive there[4]; the appearance of the Holy Spirit and the voice of the Father - “"Thou art my beloved Son; with thee I am well pleased" - are an anticipation of his resurrection.[5] This is taken up by St Paul in his teaching on the sacrament of Baptism[6]. The reply of Jesus when the Baptist suggests that he should not baptise him - “"Let it be so now; for thus it is fitting for us to fulfil all righteousness"[7] - is an indicator of this anticipation, in much the same way that Jesus' observation recorded in the fourth Gospel - “"O woman, what have you to do with me? My hour has not yet come"[8] - portrays the wedding feast at Cana as an anticipation of the moment of the passion.
In its turn the sign of the water of the river Jordan is anticipated throughout the Old Testament: the crossing of the river Jordan into the promised land, the water emerging from the rock when it was struck by Moses staff, the water of the Red Sea through which the Jews passed on their escape from Egypt, the water of the flood from which Noah was saved in the Ark. If the saving work of Christ and baptism are understood as a re-birth, as a new creation, it can be argued that the mission of John the Baptist is pre-figured in the water of the first verses of the Book of Genesis, water over which God’s spirit hovered. In this way, we can suggest the pivotal role of John the Baptist with respect to Jesus baptism is implicit from the first moment of creation.
Jesus’ Baptism, then, is understood as a repetition of the whole of history, which both recapitulates the past and anticipates the future … This struggle is the ‘conversion’ of being that brings it into a new condition, that prepares a new heaven and a new earth.[9]It is this pre-destination of the vocation of John the Baptist from the beginning of creation, a pre-destination to be the end-point of the covenant of the Old Testament, that underpins the privileges attributed to him by the New Testament texts. He is greater than any other born of a woman and he is filled with the Holy Spirit even in his mother’s womb. This particular dignity of the vocation of John the Baptist is reflected in the liturgical celebration, not only of his death on the 29th August, but of his nativity on 24th June[10].
[1] Mt 11:11; cf Lke 7:28
[2] Lke 1:14-15
[3] Catechism of the Catholic Church nn.717-720.
[4] Pope Benedict points out that Eastern iconography frequently represents the Jordan by a cave or tomb representative of Hades. In the Eastern Liturgy, hymns celebrating the feast of the Epiphany are also used in the last days of Holy Week. See Jesus of Nazareth p.19.
[5] cf Pope Benedict XVI Jesus of Nazareth p.19.
[6] cf Rom. 6:3-4: “Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life. For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his.”
[7] Mt 3:15
[8] Jn 2:4, cf Jn 12:23 and Jn 13:1, Jn 17:1.
[9] Pope Benedict XVI Jesus of Nazareth p.20.
[10] Though it has not been defined by the teaching authority of the Church, and is not reflected in the liturgical texts for the solemnity of the Birth of John the Baptist, the moment of the visitation of Elizabeth by Mary - when John leaps in his mothers womb - is seen by some writers as the moment of his redemption; the Baptist is born immaculate though he is not conceived immaculate. This is based on understanding the indwelling of the Holy Spirit as incompatible with the presence of sin.
6 comments:
But Joe, this 'pre-figuring' just sounds like literary criticism: looling at the entire story and identifying patterns and paralleles.
Looking backwards in a book we may seee a pattern or a parallel that has been placed by the author (we assume): often to help us understand a point being made.
But these points made by an author are designed from the beginning.
If we see the 'physical creation' as a 'salvation history' from its inception then God already knew Adam and Eve would disobey him from the start and I'm not sure Christians want to say this.
To look backwards and see parallels and patterns is one thing; to suggest they are intended is another.
Francis:
Thank you for the comment.
1. That God might have known that Adam and Eve would sin ... I don't see this as a problem for Christians, provided it is not implied along with his foreknowledge that God deliberately willed evil ... There is rather provocative phrase in the liturgy of the Easter vigil, which describes Adam's sin as a "happy fault" because it merits for us such a great Saviour as Christ.
2. During one stage of my studies, when I really was young and didn't just look it (no vanity here - I was speaking earlier today to the mother of a pupil I taught 20 years ago and she said I didn't look any different), phenomenology was the flavour of the day in a number of our courses. The classic phrase used by lecturers was "from the phenomenon to the real". Why can't we move from the phenomenon of the patterns and parallels to their being real? [The foreword to Pope Benedict's Jesus of Nazareth explains the kind of methodology for reading Scripture that I used in this post.]
Hello again, Joe.
You say: It is possible to understand the coming of Christ as foreseen from the first moment of creation.
But if God could foresee the need for it, couldn't he have tried a bit harder to head it off?
In Genesis he commands Adam:
Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
Given the vast amount of suffering that follows on from the fall (not least to God) I think he could have amplified the point a little.
I don't believe in God BUT if I did I'd prefer (contrary to Einstein) one who DID play dice in so far as he would create the conditions and let us get on with it and not go ahead with an experiment that he was pretty sure from the outset was going to end in disaster
As for phenomonology, frankly I never could make head nor tail of it. I dare say it has fallen out of fashion by now, anyway!
When I read, say, that we can consider parallels between Adam and Eve and Jesus and Mary, I feel we certainly can and we can no doubt find endless other parallels. However, I'm left wondering are these parallels/patterns of some significance, some revelation of God's design, some semi-secret message waiting to be identified. Or just the reader interacting with the text to create their own meaning/interpreation?
Well we have different points of view on this one. On the other hand, I think we both have the measure of Blair!
zero says
Did she spot you had new specs?
Francis:
There is a strand, certainly in Catholic theological thinking and I cannot see that it will not be represented among other Christian theologians too, that Christ would have come into the world whether or not Adam/Eve had sinned. He would have come as the fulfilment of creation - sin means that he has to come as a Redeemer, too.
Zero: even I can't remember what spectacles I was wearing twenty years ago ...
zero says
You showed the 15th century painting of the Baptism of Jesus at the Legion meeting the other evening. This evening Jamie Oliver was abroad and at a Latino Baptism, the priest used a shell to pour over the water- I don't recall seeing that here.
Post a Comment