tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8994073177496022401.post6959967515177192248..comments2024-03-27T15:00:33.760+00:00Comments on Catholic Commentary: Richard Feynman: part 1Joehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09339499088443959192noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8994073177496022401.post-30223536109039187302008-03-09T17:38:00.000+00:002008-03-09T17:38:00.000+00:00RitaI haven't ever taught that syllabus! Perhaps I...Rita<BR/><BR/>I haven't ever taught that syllabus! Perhaps I should give it a go ...Joehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09339499088443959192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8994073177496022401.post-74891707527253326252008-03-07T21:44:00.000+00:002008-03-07T21:44:00.000+00:00"Probability amplitude vectors in the A'level"......."Probability amplitude vectors in the A'level".... do you know how to teach it? I can't!<BR/><BR/>Still, thanks for the post. Certainly an interesting man, quite an inspirational communicator. I look forward to the rest of your series.Ritahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15120333351409730480noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8994073177496022401.post-82073572164680953302008-03-07T11:58:00.000+00:002008-03-07T11:58:00.000+00:00*grins*A friend of mine gave me "QED - The Strange...*grins*<BR/><BR/>A friend of mine gave me "QED - The Strange Theory of Light and Matter" because I'd become upset with him because he couldn't explain to me why glass isn't opaque (while he's pursuing a research master in optics). I have yet to find a formula in it :)<BR/><BR/>To me, it was a rather weird experience because my method of learning physics always was examine physical systems -> derive formulae -> throw a bucketload of mathematics over said formulae to see what they're doing, which is rather different than "let the clock tick and draw arrows" :)<BR/><BR/> But I'm sure that as soon as I actually understand it (which might be only after I've taken the QED course during my Master's), I'll really love it!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com